Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #326333

Complaint Review: American Federation Of State County And Municipal Employees, Council 31,AFL-CIO - Springfield Illinois

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: River Grove Illinois
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • American Federation Of State County And Municipal Employees, Council 31,AFL-CIO 615 S. Second St., P.O.Box 2328, Springfield, Illinois U.S.A.

American Federation Of State County And Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO Council 31,AFL-CIO AFSCME, Council 31 took my Union fees for 7 years, then allowed City Colleges to fire me when I exposed ghost student grades corruption, the AFSCME used my fees to hire a law firm to sustain my firing -instead of protecting my job. Springfield Illinois

*Consumer Comment: AFSCME is a Corrupt Organization

*Consumer Suggestion: A few potential claims

*Consumer Suggestion: A few potential claims

*Consumer Suggestion: A few potential claims

*Consumer Suggestion: A few potential claims

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I was teaching Adult Education at City Colleges ffrom 1981 to 1998. In 1991 we voted to become part of the union American Federation of State County and Municioal Employees (AFSCME, Council 31) for job protection. The classes were free to students, paid by the State of Illinois, and the Illinois of Public Aid (PA) required foreign student receiving assistance to attend English as a Second Language classes to obtain skills and find jobs. But many students tried to beat the system by register for the PA required classes, and after the morning roll call to answer "Present," then they got up and left saying: "Sorry, teacher, I have to go to work." But when they left, I changed the attendance roster to "Absent", and when at the end of the month they brought me a PA form to verify their attendance, I marked all absences, and the PA cut their assistance and food stamps. Those students were cheating PA by getting assistance and work for cash! And I didn't want to be part of their schemes because I would legally liable for falsifying student reports to help them commit welfare fraud. On March 11, 1998, I notified by U.S. Certified Mail the Illinois Department of Public Aid of the scheme going on at City Colleges with the consent of the Union.

The Union
asked me to recant the PA letter of fraud, because the "Present" grades need for the class funding, and, if it was cuf off, the teachers will lose jobs, and the Union will lose their fees. [Copy of original letter to Illioins Public Aid available] The City Colleges and AFSCME were furious, and harassed me in various ways.

Then AFSCME and the City Colleges of Chicago used their clout and tried to scrap a BIll (SB1750) pending before the Illinois House Committee. I then sent letters on May 1, 1998 to each member of that Committee, and urged them to pass the the law which -if pass "will establish accountability that will get rid of many educational parasites," on quote. (Copy of that original letter is available).

On June 10, 1998, the Chicago Tribune headlined: "Students get A's for nothing," confirming that the fraud I had reported to Public Aid was also going on at The West Side Institute, anothe City Collges of Chicago campus.
(Copy of that Tribune headline is available)

Ten days later, on June 20, 1998, I was fired by City Colleges of Chicago. The AFSCME filed a grievance for wrongful job termination with City Colleges of Chicago, but is was a smokescreen. And when I contested the case in courts by myself - the Union had cancelled the fake arbitration set up- the Union hired a law firm who joined another law firm hired by the City Colleges
of Chicago and both fought me all the way to the Illinois Supreme Court. There was no way that an individual like me, no matter my high education, could fight the flood of motions by 2 law firms and win a case.

A Union, using the fees of a member to hire a law firm to secure the firing of a whistleblower member for exposing fraud may seem to be unheard in history. But it happend more often, and it just swept under the rug.

In 2001 I started working for the State of Illinois, and AFSCME with hefty political contributions to both Democrats and Republicans has secured control of representation of all State employees. Worse yet, I had to pay monthly fees to the Union that used my prior fees to prosecute my prior employment. Under a "Fair Share Law," the Union took fees from my paycheck without my consent. That was a violation of my U.S. Constitutional Rights, 5th Amemdment, because I was forced agaisnt my will to finance my own prosecution. But there was no way out. The AFSCME used it clout to make the "Fair Share" law foolproof by allowing in the law only a provision for a non-member to "Challenge" the Union fees by arbitration. By the arbitration
request is made to the Union -not the State- and the Union can ignore it without any penalty. Six years and six requests for arbitration to the Union
were never processed.

Upon further research, I found that forcing a person to belong to an organization and paying dues violates 3 Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But unfortunately, the U.S. is not a party of the Protocol of Civil and Political Rights, and that is why the Intenational Human Rights Commission has no rights to Guantanamo detainees. On an inquiry to the
Int'L Human Rights Commission I was told that I could not file a complaint agaisnt the U.S. for allowing "forcible memberships" by Unions

Also the National labor Relations Board, and the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice told me they have no jurisdiction. And a letter to U.S. Senator John McCain for congessional hearings on the AFSCME's prosecution of a whistleblower, got no response.

In a true democracy, Unions shall not be able to extract fees against the will of laborers, then use those fees as political financing for politicians [their charter says that fees are not used for political constibutions, if anybody can believe that] to customize laws that benefit the Union management against the interest of their members. Exposue is needed in that confy relationship between politicians and unions that has become an anathema to every honest citizen in the United States. The late Wisconsin Senator William Proxmire, who never accepted money as political contribution , told NBC's Tom Brokaw in an interview: "People come to Washington with money and buy
legislation." And in a true democracy, nobody shall be able to empty the pockets of other people against their will, then use that money to prosecute them and mess their lives LEGALLY!!!! AND WRITTEN IRREFUTABLE DOCUMENTAION IS AVAILABLE!

Nikos xxxxx
River Grove, Illinois
U.S.A.

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/15/2008 04:49 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/american-federation-of-state-county-and-municipal-employees-council-31afl-cio/springfield-illinois-62705-2328/american-federation-of-state-county-and-municipal-employees-afl-cio-council-31afl-cio-af-326333. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
5Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#5 Consumer Comment

AFSCME is a Corrupt Organization

AUTHOR: AFSCME sucks - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, November 23, 2009

This sounds typical.  I have had a fair bit of dealing with AFSCME people  which I will post some stuff in the near future.

From my experiences with AFSCME, their goal is to bloat government budgets, subvert statutes, violate contracts and help managers in government actions remain insulated and unaccountable for fraud waste and abuse of public funds on all levels.  My experience and research leads me to that in a AFSCME workplace a worker is almost guaranteed reprisal by management  for reporting any concern of a violation.

They use any  tactic of disinformation to avoid accountability. I have seen that if there is a complaint against management, they usually see that the manager is illegally promoted to bolster  their credibility.  And the person that makes the report of a violation  soon has a systematic retaliation campaign launched against them that may include conspiracy, retaliatory reassignment/transfer, vexatious litigation, perjury and extortionate threats.  Of course they act confused about the violation that lead to the complaint and refuse at all steps to file a grievance.

What really they do is  donate millions of dollars to the Hillary Clinton Campaign long after it was known that she could not muster enough votes in the electoral college.  They donate to numerous other campaigns of their political friends of both parties, but mostly D's of course.

As this person has expressed, AFSCME is a truly parasitic organization. They take money extorted from the workers' every single  check, do not represent them, and when it comes down to finger pointing they use that money against the employee's best interests.  Their violations are funded by the perpetually renewed source; out of other employee's hard earned money.

Their  main purpose seems to be 'organizing' and most of the upper echelon AFSCME officials are involved in political agendas and have no experience and  nothing to do with representing employees. and most of their Business Agents appear to lack any knowledge of Collective Bargaining  contracts  and EEOC guidelines. 

Another purpose of the AFSCME  is to provide revolving door  employment for political appointees and HR managers who leave government, or are ousted by incoming republican administrations.  More often than not these employment  changes violate state conflict of interest laws;  more outrageous is when, for the purpose of eliminating conflict of interest,  stipulations are drafted and the BM/BA agrees to not represent their bargaining unit for a period of years before and after their date of leaving the state's employment.  It results in  the employee denied acess to the grievance process, while management cooks up a sham case for termination.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Suggestion

A few potential claims

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 25, 2008

Nikos,

You have a pretty good grasp on what went on there.

I would suggest, if the statute of limitations has not passed, pursuing claims for wrongful termination, violations of the National Labor Relations Act, possibly RICO violations, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Whistleblower's Protection Act.

I'm not sure how monay of those claims would fly, but they would be worth a shot. Bear in mind that unions came about in a time where children were forced to spend countless hours a day slaving away for pennies, and where the worker basically had no rights.

Nowadays, the union has become somewhat of a drain on society, although I still see them as a necessary evil. When they cross the line to protecting the interests of management over employees, however, something needs to change.

Best of luck, and accolades for your honesty.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

A few potential claims

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 25, 2008

Nikos,

You have a pretty good grasp on what went on there.

I would suggest, if the statute of limitations has not passed, pursuing claims for wrongful termination, violations of the National Labor Relations Act, possibly RICO violations, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Whistleblower's Protection Act.

I'm not sure how monay of those claims would fly, but they would be worth a shot. Bear in mind that unions came about in a time where children were forced to spend countless hours a day slaving away for pennies, and where the worker basically had no rights.

Nowadays, the union has become somewhat of a drain on society, although I still see them as a necessary evil. When they cross the line to protecting the interests of management over employees, however, something needs to change.

Best of luck, and accolades for your honesty.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

A few potential claims

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 25, 2008

Nikos,

You have a pretty good grasp on what went on there.

I would suggest, if the statute of limitations has not passed, pursuing claims for wrongful termination, violations of the National Labor Relations Act, possibly RICO violations, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Whistleblower's Protection Act.

I'm not sure how monay of those claims would fly, but they would be worth a shot. Bear in mind that unions came about in a time where children were forced to spend countless hours a day slaving away for pennies, and where the worker basically had no rights.

Nowadays, the union has become somewhat of a drain on society, although I still see them as a necessary evil. When they cross the line to protecting the interests of management over employees, however, something needs to change.

Best of luck, and accolades for your honesty.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

A few potential claims

AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 25, 2008

Nikos,

You have a pretty good grasp on what went on there.

I would suggest, if the statute of limitations has not passed, pursuing claims for wrongful termination, violations of the National Labor Relations Act, possibly RICO violations, civil conspiracy, and violations of the Whistleblower's Protection Act.

I'm not sure how monay of those claims would fly, but they would be worth a shot. Bear in mind that unions came about in a time where children were forced to spend countless hours a day slaving away for pennies, and where the worker basically had no rights.

Nowadays, the union has become somewhat of a drain on society, although I still see them as a necessary evil. When they cross the line to protecting the interests of management over employees, however, something needs to change.

Best of luck, and accolades for your honesty.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now