Jeffrey Wilens Jeffrey N Wilens Scammer lawyer Jeffrey Wilens is Scamming people to file fake lawsuits in false promise of a big payout Yorba Linda California

This attorney sent me 2 emails, last one this week, trying to lure me to participate in his scam. It was sent by Jessica Young his Paralegal at Lakeshore Law Center

What a creepy man, I google his name and found what a scammer he is, read here who is Jeffrey Wilens  classactionscams.com/

I found here that this scammer is also a wife cheater, Jeffery Wilens (((REDACTED)))

He is suing so many, Jeffrey Wilens even sued google techdirt.com/blog/?tag=jeffrey+wilens

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin features a thoughtful piece discussing the Internet smear campaign launched by a criminal being sued by Jeffrey Wilens and the Lakeshore Law Center.  None of the posters on the Rip Off Report are legitimate clients or potential clients.  They are all fabricated or bribed by the owner of Explore Talent and Michael Roberts, his hired gun. 

What a whining little b**** this "Anthony" is. 

Let's look at the original false statement, which was that a supposed potential client was solicited by Jeffrey Wilens to join a "fake" class action and the client would make lots of money.

That is a blatant lie.  No such client or potential client exists.  If he does, what is his name?  Phone records should show this conversation if it occurred telephonically.

Now, does Anthony even attempt to justify or prove the original lie?  Not at all.

Instead his proof is that a long time ago, a lawsuit on behalf of victims of Directv was dismissed by the judge.  Note the judge did NOT find the lawsuit to be frivolous.  Yes, the plaintiffs were ordered to reimburse the defendant's legal fees under a law called the "anti-slapp" law.  However, that is not the first time persons bringing a legitimate lawsuit and had to pay the other side's fees, it can happen.

Everyone knows Judges make bad rulings and that was a bad ruling.  In fact, if you read the article quoted, you will see it is very sympathetic to my legal argumetns and my clients and my client who was quoted does not blame me for the unfair ruling.  Ultimately, a reasonable compromise was reached by the way and he did not pay that entire amount. 

However the statement that I lost 16 class actions against Directv is a complete lie.  In fact, I won the vast majority of my litigation against Directv defending many victims of Directv's attempts to extort money from people who it suspected were stealing Directv services.

The "Anthony" making the consumer comment is the same person as the original poster who is the same person making all the posts about me on Rip Off Report.  He is a professional Internet "hitman" hired by the owner of Explore Talent to defame me because I threaten to shut down his illegal business. 

This comment does not present any evidence that he or the supposedly different original poster were ever contacted by my office.

Moreover, the federal court judgment is against a "Doe Defendant" because he went to great lengths to conceal his identity, including using fake email addresses and a Russian server.

However, the court ruled that I validly served the defaming b****** by email.  He knew about the lawsuit and even bragged that there was nothing I could do to enforce my judgment.  He even posted on his website that I was trying to shut him down by means of the federal court lawsuit and whined about his "first amendment rights."  How could he even make that whining statement if he was not aware of the then pending lawsuit?

It is true the judgment was only $20,000 when the judge could have imposed stiffer penalties but subsequently this idiot violated the court order by creating more bogus websites.  I could pursue additional monetary sanctions if there is a point to doing so.  But it may not be worthwhile since the coward won't even pay the $20,000.

Jeffrey Wilens blaming others to be liars but based on the facts Jeffrey Wilens appears to be the liar, read below and decide for yourself.

Jeffrey Wilens claims in his above post that he got a “$20,000 judgment plus a finding that his postings on other websites were defamatory”.  Reviewing the court documents in that case, it shows although Jeffrey Wilens claimed the websites were defamatory and requested $100,000 per site,  the Judge did not rule or awarded anything about the websites being defamatory but only awarded $20,000 to be paid by an anonymous party for 2 alleged trademark infringements of the name “Jeffrey Wilens” and “Lakeshore law Center”, $10,000 per name. 

Jeffrey Wilens lied to the court in the lawsuit alleging these websites were used by a competitor which would violate the trademark, although they are not from a competitor but from his victims. The fact here is Trademark infringements claims are only valid if the trademarked name was used by competitor, but the reality is these “trademarked names” was used only to voice freedom of speech by victims who are clearly NOT a competitor.

The person who posted this complaint is the owner of an illegal business who was sued by my law firm and another law firm.  In preliminary rulings by the Judge, the case has been found to be meritorious. 

He is NOT a client of the Lakeshore Law Center.  He is not someone who spoke to me or anyone else in my office about becoming a client.  He is a liar.

He is the same person who I sued in United States District Court and obtained a court judgment for $20,000 plus a finding that his postings on other websites were defamatory.  In that lawsuit, the exact same "fake client" complaint was made.

Notice he does not identify himself or present any proof he is a real client.  He does not produce a single email, proof of a phone conversation, a retainer agreement or anything else.

Eventually I obtained a court order to shut down his websites (he created over 10 of them to defame me). 

So now he is hiding behind anonymous postings.

This is my challenge:  If this anonymous poster will identify himself, I will present solid legal evidence to prove he is operating an illegal business and is motivated by his greed and desire to continue to rip off California consumers.