Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1006824

Complaint Review: Route 44 Toyota - Raynham Massachusetts

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Middleboro Review — Middleboro Massachusetts United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Route 44 Toyota 1154 New State Highway Raynham, Massachusetts United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

April 2012, I purchased a 2012 Prius C. In less than 1 month, I reported 3 'incidents.'

The last 2 of those incidents was BRAKE FAILURE, which a Route 44 Toyota technician sitting in the passenger seat of the vehicle witnessed repeatedly.

The vehicle had NO BRAKES. Route 44 Toyota refused to address the issue, denied the problem, indicated 'No Computer Error Message.'  

Route 44 Toyota made 3 credit inquiries and I never applied for credit. In addition, they ran a credit inquiry of an unrelated third party who also did no apply for credit  6 months after I paid for the vehicle. This violates our rights under FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act].

They gathered my information when I test drove a vehicle. Please check your credit report if you have been to this dealership. Their actions are illegal.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/31/2013 02:22 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/route-44-toyota/raynham-massachusetts-02767/route-44-toyota-caution-route-44-toyota-raynham-massachusetts-1006824. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
2Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Author of original report

Route 44 Toyota Threatens SLAPP suit for posting the truth

AUTHOR: Middleboro Review - ()

POSTED: Sunday, April 21, 2013

When I initially became aware that Route 44 Toyota had illegally requested my credit report twice, as well as that of a disinterested 3rd Party, my attorney faxed copies of those inquiries to their attorney, Daniel Viera.

In response to my posting that truthful information in this forum, Daniel Viera threatened a SLAPP suit - Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, with the intent to silence and intimidate.

Rather than acknowledging an error and removing all 3 credit inquiries, Attorney Viera's bizarre response --

"I am not at liberty to discuss with you in detail why those claims are both false....."

posted here: http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/2013/03/route-44-toyota-threatens-slapp-suit.html

For those interested in boring themselves, the reasons for which credit inquiries may be made according to the FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act] are posted here:

http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/2013/04/route-44-toyota-and-fcra-fair-credit.html

Since the law clearly enumerates specificity, surely disclosure of their nefarious reasons was warranted.

2 of those inquiries were made subsequent to suit having been filed and all communication should have ceased which it did not.

Plymouth Court: Civil Action #1259CV871

Another Route 44 Toyota customer posted a similar problem in the RipOff Report web site that

Route 44 Toyota refused to address/correct:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/auto-dealers/route-44-toyota/route-44-toyota-belittling-sal-44522.htm#

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Middleboro Review,

AUTHOR: Karl - ()

POSTED: Sunday, March 17, 2013

You can upload a picture of your Toyota Prius and have it displayed at this website so everyone can see it. Feel free to type in 1012220 at this site and click on Ripoff Report #1012220 in order to see a picture of the Toyota FJ Cruiser that was uploaded by Gus at his Ripoff Report.

You can also make a Youtube video and display pictures of your Toyota Prius. Feel free to 'Google' this- TOYOTA AVOIDS RECALL AND FALSIFIES SAFETY RECORD FOR SEQUOIA DEFECT, and watch that short video on the web.

Good luck to you, and make sure to spread your Ripoff Report all over the web at sites like Twitter and Facebook!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Route 44 Toyota Threatens SLAPP Suit

AUTHOR: Middleboro Review - ()

POSTED: Sunday, March 17, 2013

On the day I delivered payment in full for our new Prius, I provided my social security number to Route 44 Toyota for them to complete documents for the Registry of Motor Vehicles.

On that day, they ran my credit report even though I NEVER applied for credit and NO signed credit application exists.

On the day Route 44 Toyota discovered MY vehicle on their property with no license plates [because I had turned them in], they ran my credit report, as well as the credit report of a disinterested 3rd party.

Our brand new vehicle was left on the property of Route 44 Toyota because it has NO BRAKES!

How can I drive a vehicle with NO BRAKES?

On that day, we did not travel to Route 44 Toyota nor complete any credit applications. Route 44 Toyota had already been put on notice of a lawsuit and failed to cease communicating with me.

Unauthorized access to credit information is in violation of FCRA [Fair Credit Reporting Act], a federal statute. It is ILLEGAL.

Because I posted this, Route 44 Toyota is now threatening a SLAPP suit, explained here:

http://middlebororeview.blogspot.com/2013/03/route-44-toyota-threatens-slapp-suit.html

In response to my complaint filed with CFPB [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau], Credco responded:

Our investigation into this matter determined that [complainant's] credit report was ordered by our client, Route 44, on or about April 23, 2012 and October 11, 2012, respectively. In order to obtain these credit reports on [complainant], Route 44 represented to us each time that it had a permissible purpose to do so. After receipt of this complaint, Credco contacted Route 44 and confirmed the certification of permissible purpose. The address and telephone number for Route 44 is as follows:

Route 44 Toyota

1094 New State Hwy.

Raynham, MA 02767

Phone: 508-824-4044


Dan Viera, attorney for Route 44 Toyota indicated, here comes the SLAPP threat:
"I am not at liberty to discuss with you in detail why those claims are both false. I suspect that you will amend your complaint regardless of what the facts may be but let me simply tell you that the dealership can only obtain a credit report from a customer or potential customer who has provided their social security number. That information is not collected as part of the test drive of a motor vehicle."



"In that regard, your client has recently made a post on an online website referred to as
www.dealerrater.com. Apparently, that web site is used in an attempt to resolve disputes between automobile dealers and consumers by allowing the consumer to post information and providing the dealership with an opportunity to respond before the post becomes official.....In it [the complainant] claims that the dealership "illegally" accessed her credit report. Accusing the dealership of engaging in illegal activity is libel per se. My client does not take these matters lightly and I would suggest that you communicate with your client to cease and desist from these types of tactics. They will not serve to resolve her case but do expose her to potential liability. Your client is represented by counsel and has a pending lawsuit. She should let you do your job."

I filed a 'Petition for Defect Investigation' with NHTSA that they are pursuing. The Toyota Prius had NO BRAKES and you will find other similar complaints listed on the NHTSA web site.

Route 44 Toyota REFUSED to repair or replace my vehicle.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now