Complaint Review: Affluent Page Magazine and Mario Jourdan - Internet
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Affluent Page Magazine and Mario Jourdan Internet United States of America
- Phone:
- Web: www.affluentpageluxuryindex.com
- Category: Advertising / Deceptive
Affluent Page Magazine and Mario Jourdan The Affluent Page Magazine and Affluent Art Collector does not pay for services Internet
*Consumer Comment: False Accusation
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/24/2010 12:12 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/affluent-page-magazine-and-mario-jourdan/internet/affluent-page-magazine-and-mario-jourdan-the-affluent-page-magazine-and-affluent-art-coll-606696. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#1 Consumer Comment
False Accusation
AUTHOR: MrMcQ - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 09, 2010
I don't know about anyone else, but this seems more like a hateful qualm against a company that has a strong reputation in the publishing industry. I have been working with Affluent Page and directly with Mario Jourdan for many years now, and have found their business more than satisfactory. This company only deals with professionally, and by the looks of it, no longer required this individual's services for a good reason.
It is evident by the presentation of your claim that this is only a vendetta against a company that no longer required your services. If there is positive proof that they printed your work, then this would be a copyright issue. Otherwise, this is a merely a misdirected allegation and should be removed.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
